Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Lawsuit claims Emory lost part of patient’s skull, billed him $19K for replacement
By Ariel Hart - The Atlanta Journal-Constitution,
13 hours ago
Fernando Cluster went to Emory University Hospital Midtown with a brain bleed in September of 2022. It was serious: They needed to remove part of his skull temporarily, in order to give his brain space to swell and heal.
But when he went in to surgery again six weeks later for surgeons to replace the skull piece — the size of a saucer, about 4.5 inches by 6 inches — Emory couldn’t find it.
The surgery was canceled. What came next was several days of waiting, as Emory had to order a synthetic replacement to be produced in the exact shape of the missing piece, called a “bone flap.” After he received the skull implant, Cluster developed an infection, which the lawsuit calls a known complication that can arise from a synthetic implant.
Cluster and his wife have now filed a lawsuit asking the courts to order Emory to compensate them for injuries and damages.
In addition to the cost of his surgery, the lawsuit says Emory has charged $146,845.60 for things that were a direct result of their mistake. That includes more than $19,000 for the synthetic skull implant itself.
Part of Fernando Cluster's skull was temporarily removed to relieve pressure on his brain, with the missing piece being about the size of a saucer, or around 4.5 inches by 6 inches. When he went back in for surgery to reimplant it, the hospital could not find the missing piece. (Photos courtesy of the Cluster family and Hornsby Law Group)
Credit: Courtesy of the Cluster family
According to documents the Clusters assembled for the lawsuit, Emory doctors added a note to Cluster’s medical file explaining the events of the day his surgery was canceled: “Although we were informed yesterday by OR (operating) staff that Mr. Cluster’s bone flap was located and ready for replacement, it could not be found today when preparing for surgery. We inspected the freezer where bone flaps are stored and could not find a bone flap with Mr. Cluster’s patient identification. There were several bone flaps with incomplete or missing patient identification, but we could not be certain which if any of these belonged to Mr. Cluster. As a result we unfortunately were forced to cancel the surgery. The circumstances of the cancellation were discussed in detail with the patient, his spouse (who was present) and other family over the phone. They were understandably upset by the situation and we encouraged them to reach out to patient advocacy.”
Chloe Dallaire, the Clusters’ lawyer in the case, said Emory never offered a discount as a result of the mistake. His medical insurance through his wife’s employer paid most of the cost.
“While my clients are obviously upset that they and their insurance company were billed for the costs related to Emory’s negligence, I’m sure you can understand that their focus is on the egregiousness of Emory losing a part of his body and then having a flippant attitude about it afterwards,” said Chloe Dallaire, his lawyer.
Asked for a response, a spokeswoman for Emory said it does not comment on pending litigation.
“Emory Healthcare is committed to providing high-quality, compassionate care for patients and those we serve in our communities,” said the spokeswoman, Jennifer Phillips.
Decades ago the handling of bone implants within hospitals was barely regulated, and doctors could rely on their own storage and judgment, which sometimes resulted in dangerous mistakes. Implants of bone and other tissue are now regulated by the Food and Drug Administration.
According to the American Association of Tissue Banks, there are federal regulations that require tracking of tissue when it’s taken from one person to be implanted in another, for transplantation. That lasts only up until the moment when it’s given to the hospital or clinic where it is to be implanted. Then, the hospital must follow more standards for the implantation.
According to the AATB’s website, it is “critical for healthcare facilities to have systems” in place to track implants, such as bar codes containing unique identifiers.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0