Nick Chubb Workout Turning Heads After Gruesome Injury

Nick Chubb is built differently than most human beings.

A video of the Cleveland Browns' All-Pro running back doing single-legged lateral jumps was uploaded on social media on Thursday, nine months after his gruesome knee injury.

Chubb underwent two surgeries in his left knee to repair his ACL, meniscus, MCL and medial capsule. The injury happened in a Monday Night Football game in Week 2 against the rival Pittsburgh Steelers, when Chubb took a low hit from Steelers safety Minkah Fitzpatrick in the red zone

The injury was so gruesome that ESPN decided not to show the replay.

Not only did he miss the rest of the 2023 season, but there were concerns he'd miss most of 2024 as well. However, the 28-year-old running back might have put those fears to rest with his incredible workout video.

NFL fans are blown away by how quickly Chubb is healing. It isn't normal to see a person recover from such a devastating knee injury in such a short amount of time.

One fan pointed out that Chubb wasn't wearing a knee brace.

"How is this even possible!?" another fan asked.

"Amazing!" one fan posted on social media.

"So incredibly great to see this. After that injury I was concerned about him just keeping his leg. If it weren’t Nick Chubb this would be hard to believe," another fan said.

One fan posted a "that's my running back" GIF.

Chubb is expected to return at some point during the season, but after seeing his progress, one has to wonder if Week 1 is a real possibility.

The Browns would be smart to take their time with the four-time Pro Bowler.

Chubb is their best offensive player, and his presence would go a long way towards helping them contend for a Super Bowl. He's two years removed from his monstrous 2022 season, when he rushed for 1,525 yards and 12 touchdowns.

If that version of Chubb returns, it'll be back to the regularly scheduled programming of the Browns running down every opponent's throat.

Related: Dez Bryant's Angel Reese Accusation Draws Stern Stephen A. Smith Reply