Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
KESQ News Channel 3
Palm Springs ‘shocked’ by $105M counteroffer from Section 14 survivors, ‘could easily bankrupt the city’
By Jesus Reyes,
2024-05-24
The City of Palm Springs released a statement saying they were "shocked" and "astounded" by a $105 million counteroffer from the Section 14 survivors group.
Section 14 near downtown Palm Springs was home to hundreds of people, mostly minority families, until the 1950s and 1960s when they were evicted.
The city later participated in clearing those properties.
City officials said the Palm Springs City Council approved $4.3 million in total for Section 14 survivors. Areva Martin , the attorney representing the group, is asking for nearly $105 million, which a city spokeswoman said, "could easily bankrupt the city."
"If this is in fact Ms. Martin’s real offer then Staff is preparing to recommend to the City Council to work with each survivor and/or their descendants on direct cash payments," writes Amy Blaisdell, chief communications officer for the city of Palm Springs.
"My colleagues and I recognize that City funds were used to clear land which housed individuals and "Families who were tenants on the property, including minority groups. We know that we as a city need to right that wrong and in today’s Closed Session we collectively agreed on a number of steps to accomplish that goal," reads a statement by Palm Springs Mayor Jeffrey Bernstein (4/11/24).
Martin also released a statement to News Channel 3 reading in part, "We are looking forward to continuing our negotiations with the city."
Stay with News Channel 3 for any new developments.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0