Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
On3.com
MAILBAG: Reviewing the Connor Stalions doc, is Texas overrated, which CFB team will be the talk of Week 1?
By Jesse Simonton,
6 hours ago
We’re a day away from the Week 1 bender that is the true start of the 2024 college football season. So let’s wrap up some final preseason thoughts, as well as a review of the Connor Stallions documentary.
Aaron E. Martinez/American-Statesman / USA TODAY NETWORK
From Matt: What were your thoughts on the Connor Stalions documentary?
My prediction on Monday’s Andy Staples Show that the Netflix Connor Stalions doc “Untold: Sign Stealer” would be a total nothing-burger was wrong.
Instead, it was 90 minutes of PR, spin and victimhood — so at times nominal interesting.
As has come to be with these “Untold” docs (see: last year’s “Swamp Kings”), mostly everything in them has already been reported previously. We knew that Stalions was a zealot who so badly wanted to work at Michigan that he became (maybe?) the first person to ever to serve in the Marines to just to become a football coach.
We knew that Stalions wasn’t going to actually admit to anything interesting, and there would be no smoking gun to prove his innocence or guilt. We knew that he wouldn’t actually give up the goods on his “manifesto.”
While the peak behind the curtain with NCAA investigators was novel, Stalions (and his lawyer’s) defiance with the NCAA was framed as him being a victim of this whole ordeal.
Perhaps most importantly, still have no idea how good Stalions was at actually stealing signs or how much it even helped Michigan win its 2023 national title. Stalions states that he was simply better at codebreaking than anyone else in college football — the veracity of such claims were never actually explored, though.
Ultimately, the doc was mostly an absurd watch on an absurd character. Despite plenty of suspenseful music and shots of back-alleys with graffiti, it lacked actual intrigue and answers.
It did put a face to a meme and a name associated with a manifesto, but that’s about it.
Jason asks: Georgia Tech beating FSU was the story of Week 0, so what unranked team will everyone be talking about after this weekend?
There’s a couple different ways to attack this question.
A loss would trigger an epic meltdown powerful enough to crash Message Board Geniuses. A win would earn Napier two weeks of goodwill before another pressure-filled home date with Texas A&M.
Elsewhere, West Virginia has an opportunity to pull off a Top 10 upset against No. 7 Penn State to change the narrative around its program in 2024.
Morgantown will be a buzzed up, blazing hornet’s nest on Saturday at high noon, and Penn State is breaking in new offensive, defensive and special teams coordinators. The Nittany Lions are favored by 8.5-points with good reason, but in a Week 1 spot, they can get got by Garrett Greene , CJ Donaldson & Co.
If West Virginia can beat Penn State, then the Mountaineers can absolutely compete for a wide-open Big 12 title.
The last obvious candidate for this question is Colorado — and like Florida, for good or worse.
If Deion Sanders’ team smokes North Dakota State, then the Buffs will suck up tons of internet oxygen like they did in 2023 when they started 3-0.
But if Shedeur Sanders and Colorado lose at home to an FCS team (former powerhouse or not), then the schadenfreude at Coach Prime’s expense will also dominate podcasts and column headlines.
Kenneth asks: Is Texas the most overrated team in 2024? You don’t lose that much talent & just pick up where you left off. Especially defensively. They won’t be as dominant up front & their DBs are a liability. Great OL & good QB, but top weapons are gone & lost 1st & 2nd string RBs already.
Nope. After one week, Florida State is the only known overrated team so far in 2024. But stay tuned, there will be more!
Is Texas one of them? TBD.
The Longhorns are really talented, but I agree that they have concerns along the defensive interior without Byron Murphy and T’Vondre Sweat . I’m not as down on the secondary and while they lost some really good playmakers, they portal’d in some dudes in Isaiah Bond, Amari Niblack, Silas Bolden and Matthew Golden. Chemistry could be an issue early on, but this is a group that will make plays.
In the end, we’ll know a lot about the true potential of this Texas team (ranked No. 4 in most preseason polls) in its Week 2 game at Michigan.
Marcus asks: Why are you so down on LSU? They have an awesome offensive line. Garrett Nussmeier showed what he is capable of against Wisconsin in the bowl game. Blake Baker should improve their defense. What’s not to like?
But LSU’s No. 1-ranked offense from last season was historically dominant. For all the optimism around Nussmeier, this is still a unit that must replace a Heisman-winning quarterback, two first-round wide receivers and its offensive coordinator.
So will the Tigers be able to run the ball without the threat of the QB’s legs? Is Lacy ready to be WR1?
There are legitimate unknowns, and that’s before you then account for a defense that was terrible in 2023.
Can a bad unit improve? Sure. The coaching should be better with Baker, Kevin Peoples and Bo Davis, but the personnel is largely the same.
Maybe Harold Perkins Jr. replicates his flashes of brilliance in 2022 or perhaps the inconsistencies is just part of the package . The Tigers didn’t adequately address the holes on the defensive line and their secondary features a combination of sophomore and seniors who all struggled last fall.
This is a prove it year for Brian Kelly and LSU. Sunday’s marquee matchup against USC should be telling on a lot of fronts.
So maybe I’m wrong and shortchanging the Tigers. But until I see it, I remain bearish on the Bayou Bengals in 2024.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0