Union Center
Lifestyle
Did Stephen King Claim Trump Harmed a Dog?
Yes, Stephen King suggested that former president Donald Trump might boost his approval ratings by killing a dog. Here are the main points: - Stephen King commented that Donald Trump could become more popular if he killed a dog, noting that Trump has maintained support despite other controversies. - The comment attracted significant attention, with over half a million views and more than 1,000 likes, showing public interest in the topic. - People had mixed reactions to King's statement, with some agreeing and others upset by the notion of a politician taking such drastic actions. - King's remarks were made in the context of South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, who faced criticism for a social media post about shooting her dog. King's speculative comment highlights the polarized political environment and the public's interest in controversial figures like Donald Trump.
Parks department skips federal funding for shooting range to avoid additional site scrutiny
The South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks wanted to use federal funding to help offset the cost of a $20 million shooting range outside Rapid City. That is, until the department learned more time was needed to analyze the site’s significance to Native Americans. Artifacts had been found, according to the state Tribal Historic Preservation Office familiar with the site.
Parks department skips federal funding for shooting range to avoid additional site scrutiny
The South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks wanted to use federal funding to help offset the cost of a $20 million shooting range outside Rapid City. That is, until the department learned more time was needed to analyze the site’s significance to Native Americans. Artifacts had been found, according to the state Tribal […] The post Parks department skips federal funding for shooting range to avoid additional site scrutiny appeared first on South Dakota Searchlight.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.